Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran: A Geopolitical Tightrope Walk
Table of Contents
- Historical Threads: The Deep Roots of Regional Relations
- Armenia and Iran: A Strategic Alignment
- Azerbaijan and Iran: A Complex Relationship
- The Syunik Corridor: A Geopolitical Flashpoint
- External Influences: Israel, Russia, and the EU/US
- Humanitarian Dimensions and Border Realities
- Iran's Evolving Role: Mediator or Escalator?
- Navigating the Future: Pathways to Stability
Historical Threads: The Deep Roots of Regional Relations
The historical tapestry connecting Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iran is rich and ancient, predating modern statehood. For centuries, these lands were intertwined under various empires, including the Persian Empire, which left an indelible cultural and linguistic mark, particularly in Azerbaijan. Both Armenia and Azerbaijan have significant historical ties to Iran, sharing cultural heritage, trade routes, and periods of shared governance. This deep-seated historical connection often informs contemporary diplomatic and public sentiment, even amidst geopolitical rivalries. However, the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the emergence of independent Armenia and Azerbaijan in the early 1990s introduced new geopolitical realities. The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, which erupted shortly after independence, became the primary fault line, shaping regional alliances and perceptions. Iran, a key regional player, has consistently advocated for a peaceful resolution to the conflict, emphasizing dialogue, respect for territorial integrity, and regional cooperation. This diplomatic approach has been a cornerstone of Iran's policy in the South Caucasus, aiming to prevent broader destabilization on its northern borders. Yet, beneath this stated neutrality, complex strategic calculations have always been at play, influencing Iran's engagement with both Yerevan and Baku.Armenia and Iran: A Strategic Alignment
Despite its stated neutrality in the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, Iran has maintained particularly strong ties with Armenia, often seen as a strategic counterbalance in the region. This relationship has deepened significantly in recent years, driven by shared geopolitical interests and economic imperatives.Secret Agreements and Arms Deals
Reports from the Armenian press since 2021 indicate that Iran has been secretly pursuing a strategic agreement with Armenia. This covert diplomacy suggests a deeper level of cooperation than publicly acknowledged, potentially aiming to solidify a long-term partnership. More overtly, the relationship has seen significant military dimensions. A source familiar with the situation told Iran International that Iran and Armenia have signed a major arms deal worth $500 million, in a move that could anger Azerbaijan. This deal reportedly includes Tehran supplying Yerevan with its infamous suicide drones, a technology that has proven effective in various conflicts. This military cooperation underscores a growing strategic alignment between Armenia and Iran, driven by Armenia's need to bolster its defenses, especially since Azerbaijan's military incursions have led to the militarization of Armenia's eastern border. Furthermore, during the 2020 war between Yerevan and Baku, Iran also supported Armenia. Notably, Iran served as the main conduit of arms and supplies from Russia to Armenia, as Russia and Armenia do not share a direct border. This role was crucial for Armenia's war effort, highlighting Iran's practical support despite its public calls for peace. The strategic implications of such support are profound, positioning Iran as a vital lifeline for Armenia and a significant factor in the regional power balance.Economic Corridors and Diversified Trade
Beyond military cooperation, economic ties between Armenia and Iran are also robust and expanding. In recent years, the signing and implementation of cultural agreements, scientific and academic cooperation, and the annual presence of Iranian tourists from Armenia have been another part of the bilateral relations. These cultural and economic exchanges foster goodwill and interdependence. Crucially, Iran's economic strategy involves diversifying its trade networks. Despite its agreement on the Aras transit corridor with Azerbaijan, Iran wants to develop another rail route via Armenia and Georgia to the Black Sea. This ambition is driven by a desire to reduce reliance on any single transit route and to open up new avenues for trade with Europe and beyond. The development of such a corridor through Armenia would further solidify economic ties and provide Armenia with a vital link to international markets, bypassing its often-contentious borders with Turkey and Azerbaijan. This shared interest in developing alternative transit routes forms a strong economic pillar of the Armenia-Iran relationship.Azerbaijan and Iran: A Complex Relationship
While Armenia and Iran deepen their strategic and economic cooperation, the relationship between Azerbaijan and Iran remains fraught with tension and mutual suspicion. Despite shared cultural heritage and a significant Azeri population within Iran, geopolitical realities and differing regional alignments often overshadow historical commonalities.Accusations, Denials, and Public Statements
The periods of renewed hostility between Azerbaijan and Armenia frequently expose the underlying tensions between Baku and Tehran. When hostility resumed between Azerbaijan and Armenia in the September war, Azerbaijani media outlets accused Iran of tacit support for Armenia. These accusations, though denied by Iran, which stated its act to make peace in Karabakh, highlight the deep mistrust that exists. Iran’s diplomatic approach has consistently emphasized dialogue, respect for territorial integrity, and regional cooperation, yet its actions, such as the arms deal with Armenia, often contradict these statements in the eyes of Baku. The complexity is further amplified by domestic issues within Iran. Iran’s current protest movement has brought Azeri issues even more to the fore, particularly given the large ethnic Azeri population in Iran. In November, President Aliyev took the unprecedented step of publicly commenting on the situation of ethnic Azeris in Iran, a move that undoubtedly irked Tehran. This public commentary signals a willingness by Azerbaijan to leverage internal Iranian dynamics, further straining an already delicate relationship.The Specter of a Stronger Azerbaijan
A significant concern for Iran, as articulated by analysts like Huseynov, is the fear that "when the conflict with Armenia is over, Azerbaijan will be strong enough to be more attractive for..." various regional and global powers, potentially shifting the balance of power in the South Caucasus. Iran's interests in maintaining the status quo, or at least a balanced power dynamic, stem from this apprehension. A highly empowered Azerbaijan, particularly one with strong ties to rivals like Israel or Turkey, could pose a strategic challenge to Iran's regional influence and security. This fear also underpins Iran's historical actions. Iran cooperated with Armenia and profited from activity in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan throughout Armenia’s control of the regions. This economic engagement, though controversial, served Iran's interests by maintaining a degree of leverage and influence in a region where its long-term strategic goals often clash with those of Azerbaijan and its allies. The potential for a post-conflict Azerbaijan to emerge as a dominant regional force, possibly aligning more closely with Western interests or Turkey, is a constant consideration for Iranian foreign policy.The Syunik Corridor: A Geopolitical Flashpoint
One of the most contentious issues currently shaping the dynamics between Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iran is the proposed "Zangezur Corridor" or Syunik corridor. This corridor, sought by Baku, would pass through Syunik, the only Armenian region bordering the Islamic Republic, aiming to connect mainland Azerbaijan with its Nakhchivan exclave. While Azerbaijan views this as a vital transport link, it is strongly opposed by Tehran. Many in Armenia fear that a possible weakening or destabilization of Iran could embolden Azerbaijan to invade Armenia in an attempt to open this land corridor. This fear is not unfounded, given the militarization of Armenia's eastern border since Azerbaijan's military incursions. For Iran, the corridor represents a direct threat to its border with Armenia and its long-standing transit routes. It would effectively cut off Iran's direct land access to Armenia, diminishing its influence and strategic depth in the South Caucasus. The corridor's establishment would also strengthen the Turkish-Azerbaijani axis, potentially creating a contiguous Turkic land bridge from Turkey to Central Asia, a development Iran views with deep suspicion. The future of the Syunik corridor remains a critical point of contention, embodying the complex web of security, economic, and geopolitical interests in the region.External Influences: Israel, Russia, and the EU/US
The intricate relations between Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iran are not confined to bilateral or trilateral dynamics. External powers, each with their own strategic interests, significantly influence the regional calculus, adding layers of complexity and potential for broader conflict.Israel's Role and Regional Stability
One of the most significant external influences is Israel’s military cooperation with Baku. This partnership, which has seen Israel supply advanced weaponry to Azerbaijan, poses direct threats to both Armenia and Iran. For Armenia, Israeli arms have contributed to Azerbaijan's military superiority, evident in recent conflicts. For Iran, Israel's presence on its northern border, through a close alliance with Azerbaijan, is viewed as a direct security threat. It explores the threats posed to both Armenia and Iran by Israel’s military cooperation with Baku and examines the broader implications for regional stability. Tehran perceives this as part of a wider strategy to encircle and destabilize the Islamic Republic, further fueling its concerns about a stronger, externally aligned Azerbaijan. This dynamic adds a significant dimension to the regional security dilemma, pushing Iran to seek closer ties with Armenia as a counterweight.Russia's Enduring Link
Russia remains a dominant player in the South Caucasus, historically seen as Armenia's primary security guarantor. As mentioned, Iran served as the main conduit of arms and supplies from Russia to Armenia during the 2020 war, underscoring the enduring military ties between Moscow and Yerevan. However, Russia's ability or willingness to fully protect Armenia has been questioned in recent years, especially as its focus shifts to the war in Ukraine. This perceived weakening of Russian commitment has pushed Armenia to diversify its security partnerships, including with Iran. The complex web of alliances means that any shift in Russia's regional posture has ripple effects, influencing the strategic choices of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iran. Against the backdrop of reconciliation efforts between Azerbaijan and Armenia under the aegis of the EU and U.S., the regional landscape is constantly shifting. These Western-led mediation efforts aim to foster a lasting peace, but their success is often challenged by the deep-seated mistrust and the competing interests of regional and external powers.Humanitarian Dimensions and Border Realities
Beyond the high-stakes geopolitical maneuvering, the human cost of regional instability is palpable. The militarization of Armenia's eastern border, following Azerbaijan's military incursions, has had a direct impact on daily life. It has been common for Armenian farmers in border areas to be directly affected by security incidents, highlighting the precariousness of life in these contested zones. This constant threat impacts livelihoods, displaces communities, and creates an environment of fear and uncertainty. Furthermore, regional conflicts can trigger significant population movements. For instance, in an unexpected turn, more than 600 people of 17 nationalities have fled into Azerbaijan from Iran in the five days since the start of the air war between Israel and Iran, an Azerbaijani source with knowledge of the situation reported. This event, while specific to a broader regional conflict, illustrates how interconnected the region is and how quickly humanitarian crises can emerge, impacting not only the immediate belligerents but also neighboring states like Azerbaijan. These humanitarian dimensions underscore the urgent need for sustainable peace and stability, transcending narrow geopolitical interests.Iran's Evolving Role: Mediator or Escalator?
Iran's role in the South Caucasus has always been multifaceted, oscillating between a self-proclaimed mediator and a perceived instigator of conflict. While Iran has long advocated for a peaceful resolution and its diplomatic approach has consistently emphasized dialogue, there are instances where its actions appear to contradict this stance. For instance, some analyses suggest that Iran is actively escalating a new round of conflict in the Southern Caucasus region, particularly through its military support for Armenia and its strong opposition to the Syunik corridor. This perspective argues that Iran's actions are driven by a desire to maintain its strategic leverage, prevent the emergence of a strong, Western-aligned Azerbaijan, and protect its direct border with Armenia. The arms deal with Armenia, including the supply of suicide drones, is cited as evidence of a more interventionist posture. Conversely, Iran denies accusations of escalating conflict, maintaining that its actions are aimed at promoting peace and stability. When hostility resumed between Azerbaijan and Armenia in September war, Azerbaijani media outlets accused Iran of tacit support for Armenia, while Iran denied these accusations and stated its act to make peace in Karabakh. This dual narrative highlights the complexity of assessing Iran's true intentions. It seeks to work with both Armenia and Azerbaijan, but its security concerns and geopolitical ambitions often dictate a preference for maintaining a specific balance of power that aligns with its national interests. Janatan Sayeh, a research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies focused on Iranian domestic affairs and the Islamic Republic’s regional malign influence, is one of many who closely observe these intricate dynamics. The PKK, having reportedly received Iranian drones to fight Turkey, has agreed to disarmament, possibly making Armenia Iran’s last leverage against Turkey and Azerbaijan, further complicating the regional security landscape and Iran's strategic calculus.Navigating the Future: Pathways to Stability
The future of the South Caucasus, and particularly the relationship between Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iran, remains uncertain and highly dependent on a delicate balance of internal and external factors. The path forward requires a nuanced understanding of each nation's core interests and a commitment to genuine dialogue. For Armenia, securing its borders and ensuring its sovereignty in the face of continued Azerbaijani pressure is paramount. Its ties to Iran, while strategic, also carry risks, potentially alienating other potential partners. For Azerbaijan, consolidating its territorial integrity and developing its economic potential, including new transit routes, is a key objective. However, pursuing these goals without exacerbating regional tensions, particularly with Iran, is a significant challenge. For Iran, safeguarding its national security, maintaining its influence in the South Caucasus, and preventing the rise of hostile alignments on its borders are non-negotiable. The international community, including the EU and U.S., has a crucial role to play in facilitating peace and stability. Continued diplomatic engagement, support for confidence-building measures, and clear messaging against military escalation are essential. Ultimately, sustainable peace in this volatile region will require a comprehensive approach that addresses historical grievances, respects territorial integrity, and fosters economic interdependence that benefits all parties. The tightrope walk involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iran will continue, and the stability of the South Caucasus hinges on their ability to find common ground amidst their divergent interests. The intricate dance between Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Iran is a microcosm of broader geopolitical struggles, reflecting the challenges of navigating historical legacies, competing ambitions, and external influences. Understanding these dynamics is not merely an academic exercise; it is crucial for anticipating regional shifts and their global repercussions. We invite you to share your thoughts on this complex geopolitical triangle in the comments below, or explore our other articles on regional security and international relations.- Israel Vs Iran Update
- Iran Elections 2024
- Persian New Year In Iran
- Iran Elections
- Noticias Iran Vs Israel
Where is Armenia? | iArmenia: Armenian History, Holidays, Sights, Events
Unlocking Armenia, The Travel Insider’s Destination To Visit In 2020
Armenia – the glorious city of old | TimesTravel
