Atlantic Council Iran: Navigating Complex Geopolitics

Deshaun Kreiger 18 Jun 2025

In the intricate and often volatile landscape of Middle Eastern geopolitics, understanding the motivations and strategies of key players is paramount. Among these, Iran stands as a nation with significant regional influence, a complex domestic situation, and a foreign policy that frequently challenges international norms. Navigating this complexity requires deep expertise and a nuanced approach, which is precisely where organizations like the **Atlantic Council Iran** program play a crucial role. They serve as a vital nexus for analysis, discussion, and the formulation of informed policy recommendations concerning one of the world's most scrutinized nations.

The Atlantic Council, a nonpartisan organization dedicated to promoting constructive leadership and engagement in international affairs, has long focused on Iran due to its pivotal position in global security and energy markets. Through its dedicated programs and initiatives, the Council brings together a diverse array of experts, policymakers, and stakeholders to dissect Iran's internal dynamics, its regional assertions, and its relationship with the United States and the wider international community. This comprehensive approach is essential for shedding light on the multifaceted challenges and opportunities presented by Iran's evolving trajectory.

The Atlantic Council's Strategic Focus on Iran
Deciphering Iran's Regional Assertiveness
- Nuclear Ambitions and Proxy Networks
- Human Rights and Hostage Diplomacy
The Dynamics of US-Iran Relations
- The Trump Era and Diplomatic Challenges
Iran and Global Climate Challenges
Analyzing Iranian Thinking: Beyond the Barrage
Tehran's Ties to Criminal Syndicates
Expert Voices Shaping the Discourse
The Iran Strategy Project: A Holistic Approach

The Atlantic Council's Strategic Focus on Iran

The Atlantic Council's commitment to understanding Iran is deeply embedded in its broader mission to shape the future through international cooperation. The organization recognizes that effective policy towards Iran requires more than just reactive measures; it demands proactive, informed analysis. The core of this effort lies within the Atlantic Council Iran Program, which "convenes experts, policy makers, activists and other key stakeholders to discuss US policy toward Iran and Iran’s policies toward the US." This dual focus ensures a comprehensive understanding of the bilateral relationship, acknowledging that both sides' actions and perceptions heavily influence the trajectory of events.

The Council's approach is not monolithic. It embraces diverse perspectives, as highlighted by the statement that "the views expressed in IranSource are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Atlantic Council, its staff, or its supporters." This commitment to intellectual independence allows for a robust and often challenging debate, fostering a deeper understanding of the complex issues at play. This intellectual rigor is crucial for an organization aiming to provide authoritative insights on a subject as sensitive and multifaceted as Iran.

Deciphering Iran's Regional Assertiveness

Iran's foreign policy is characterized by a strong assertion of its influence on the world stage, often through means that raise international concern. The Atlantic Council diligently tracks these activities, providing critical analysis for policymakers and the public. As the "Data Kalimat" states, "Through the empowerment of its proxies, advances in its nuclear program, a record of human rights abuses, and the use of hostages as a foreign policy tool, Iran aggressively asserts itself on the world stage, seeking to expand its influence and consolidate power." Each of these elements represents a significant area of focus for the Atlantic Council's experts.

Nuclear Ambitions and Proxy Networks

Perhaps no aspect of Iran's assertiveness causes more international alarm than its nuclear program. The question of "What if Iran already has the [nuclear weapon]?" is a chilling one that underscores the urgency of monitoring Tehran's capabilities. Fred Kempe, the Atlantic Council's President and CEO, has frequently discussed this critical issue, joining programs like 'Power Lunch' to delve into how close Iran is to having a nuclear weapon and its broader implications. This concern is amplified by reports that "a group of 39 Iranian lawmakers urged the Supreme National Security Council to eliminate its formal ban on the production of nuclear weapons," signaling a potentially more aggressive stance from within the Iranian establishment.

Beyond its nuclear aspirations, Iran's military strategy heavily relies on its network of proxies across the region. Masoud Mostajabi, Deputy Director of the Middle East Programs at the Atlantic Council, has spoken to NPR's Scott Simon about "Iran's military strategy with its proxies in the region." This strategy allows Tehran to project power and destabilize adversaries without direct military confrontation, creating complex challenges for regional stability and international security. The Council's analysis helps illuminate the intricacies of these proxy relationships and their impact on conflicts, such as the situation in Yemen where "Tehran faces the more immediate priority of preventing the collapse of its Houthi proxy."

Human Rights and Hostage Diplomacy

Iran's domestic human rights record is another critical area of concern. The Atlantic Council highlights the severe risks faced by creatives and activists within the country, noting that "International recognition of the acute risk creatives face in Iran is necessary to ensure their vital role in advocating for human rights continues." This underscores the Council's commitment not only to geopolitical analysis but also to humanitarian issues, recognizing the interconnectedness of internal repression and external behavior.

Moreover, Iran's use of "hostages as a foreign policy tool" is a practice that draws consistent condemnation and is closely monitored by the Atlantic Council. This tactic, often involving dual nationals or foreign citizens, adds another layer of complexity to diplomatic efforts and underscores the challenges in engaging with a regime that employs such methods.

The Dynamics of US-Iran Relations

The relationship between the United States and Iran has been fraught with tension for decades, marked by periods of confrontation and brief, often unsuccessful, attempts at reconciliation. The Atlantic Council provides a crucial platform for dissecting these complex dynamics. As noted, "The lack of diplomatic relations, changes in both the US and Iranian administrations, repeated US military interventions in the region as well as Iran’s support for militant groups and increasingly harsh rhetoric on both sides have further undermined chances for reconciliation." This encapsulates the deep-seated mistrust and structural impediments to a stable relationship.

The Trump Era and Diplomatic Challenges

The presidency of Donald Trump introduced a new phase of unpredictability and heightened tensions in US-Iran relations. "The Israeli government and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the election of US President Donald Trump for a variety of reasons, but the most important of them was his stance on Iran." This reflects the strong alignment between Washington and Jerusalem on the issue of confronting Iran, particularly after the US withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Despite the tough rhetoric, there was also a period of speculation regarding potential US diplomacy. "There has been a flurry of speculation about possible US diplomacy with Iran since US President Donald Trump began his second term," indicating that even amidst heightened tensions, the possibility of engagement remained a topic of discussion and analysis for experts like those at the Atlantic Council. Fred Kempe, as President and CEO, has been a consistent voice in these discussions, offering insights on the broader implications of US policy shifts for the Middle East.

Iran and Global Climate Challenges

Beyond the immediate geopolitical and security concerns, the Atlantic Council also examines Iran through the lens of global challenges, including climate change. This demonstrates a holistic approach to understanding the country, recognizing that environmental factors can significantly impact stability and policy. "Iran is one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)," a reality that poses significant long-term challenges for the nation's infrastructure, agriculture, and public health.

Compounding this vulnerability is Iran's considerable contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions. "It also bears significant responsibility for climate change globally and in the region, as it ranks first in the Middle East and eighth worldwide, for its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with annual carbon dioxide amounting to nearly 617 tons." This dual reality—high vulnerability and high emissions—presents a complex dilemma for Iran and for international efforts to combat climate change, requiring careful consideration from organizations like the Atlantic Council.

Analyzing Iranian Thinking: Beyond the Barrage

Understanding Iran's strategic calculus is critical, especially in moments of heightened tension. When "Tehran launched nearly two hundred missiles at Israel on Tuesday," the immediate international reaction was one of alarm. However, the Atlantic Council's experts quickly moved to analyze the deeper implications. They considered "the ways that the barrage—which was largely ineffectual—offers a window into Iranian thinking." This kind of analysis goes beyond mere reporting of events, seeking to uncover the underlying intentions, capabilities, and strategic objectives behind Iran's actions. It highlights the Council's role in providing nuanced interpretations that can inform policy responses, rather than simply reacting to headlines.

Tehran's Ties to Criminal Syndicates

An often overlooked, yet crucial, aspect of Iran's foreign policy is its alleged connections to organized criminal networks. The Atlantic Council sheds light on this shadowy dimension, revealing how "Tehran has long offered a safe harbor and a platform for dangerous organized criminal syndicates to plot assassinations, kidnappings, and sabotage around the world." This demonstrates a disturbing facet of Iran's external operations, extending its reach through illicit means.

These partnerships are not rigid but rather adaptable, offering the Iranian regime a degree of plausible deniability. As the data suggests, "These partnerships with criminal gangs are often flexible, offering plausible deniability for Tehran’s attempts to silence its foes, especially in the West." This strategy allows Iran to pursue its objectives, particularly against dissidents or perceived enemies abroad, while maintaining a distance that complicates attribution and international response. Understanding these clandestine networks is vital for counter-terrorism and national security efforts, making it a key area of focus for the Atlantic Council. Doug Livermore, a member of the Atlantic Council’s Counterterrorism Group, brings expertise to these complex issues, highlighting the Council's breadth of knowledge in irregular warfare and security.

Expert Voices Shaping the Discourse

The Atlantic Council's influence stems directly from the caliber of its experts and their ability to translate complex geopolitical realities into actionable insights. Fred Kempe, as President and CEO, frequently appears on national media, discussing critical issues like the impact of US foreign policy decisions and Iran's nuclear program. His insights on 'Squawk Box' regarding "the ongoing escalation between Israel and Iran, what the conflict means for the broader Middle East, and more" exemplify the Council's role in providing timely, high-level analysis.

Beyond its leadership, the Council boasts a deep bench of specialists. Josh Lipsky, Senior Director of the Atlantic Council GeoEconomics Center and a former adviser to the International Monetary Fund, brings an economic lens to geopolitical issues, often contributing to publications like the GeoEconomics Center’s weekly guide to the global economy newsletter, with support from Assistant Director Alisha Chhangani. Their work highlights the economic dimensions of Iran's policies and international sanctions.

Ambassador Daniel Shapiro, a distinguished fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative, offers invaluable diplomatic and defense perspectives. Having served as US Ambassador to Israel and Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Middle East Policy, his insights are particularly relevant for understanding the US-Israel-Iran dynamic. He also previously directed the Atlantic Council’s N7 Initiative, further showcasing his deep engagement with regional security challenges.

Danny Citrinowicz, a nonresident fellow with the Atlantic Council’s Middle East Programs and a member of the Atlantic Council’s Iran Strategy Project working group, provides specialized analysis on Iranian military and strategic affairs. These individuals, among many others, contribute to the Atlantic Council's reputation as a leading authority on Iran, ensuring that its analysis is grounded in deep expertise and diverse perspectives.

The Iran Strategy Project: A Holistic Approach

Recognizing the unprecedented level of discord and uncertainty surrounding Iran, the Atlantic Council has launched dedicated initiatives to synchronize its extensive work on the country. "The Iran Strategy Project is designed to synchronize and bring together the Atlantic Council’s policy and analytical efforts on Iran under a single banner, reflecting the unprecedented level of discord and uncertainty in Iran." This strategic consolidation aims to provide a more cohesive and impactful framework for understanding and addressing the challenges posed by Iran.

This new effort signifies a commitment to "undertake a holistic approach to the entirety of the Atlantic Council’s work on Iran Washington D.C." Such an approach acknowledges that Iran is not just a security challenge but also a country grappling with internal political dynamics, economic pressures, social unrest, and environmental vulnerabilities. By integrating analyses from various programs—from geoeconomics to human rights, from military strategy to climate change—the Atlantic Council aims to offer a truly comprehensive understanding of Iran's trajectory and its implications for global stability. This integrated perspective is crucial for developing effective and sustainable policies towards a nation that continues to be a central focus of international relations.

Conclusion

The Atlantic Council's dedication to providing in-depth, expert-driven analysis on Iran is indispensable in an era of complex geopolitical challenges. From dissecting Iran's regional assertiveness and nuclear ambitions to understanding its domestic human rights situation and climate vulnerabilities, the Council offers a critical lens through which to view one of the world's most pivotal nations. Through initiatives like the Iran Strategy Project, and the contributions of esteemed experts like Fred Kempe, Josh Lipsky, and Ambassador Daniel Shapiro, the Atlantic Council continues to shape informed discussions and policy recommendations.

As the international community grapples with the multifaceted dimensions of Iran's role on the global stage, the insights provided by the Atlantic Council Iran program remain vital. We encourage you to explore the Atlantic Council's publications and analyses further to deepen your understanding of these critical issues. What are your thoughts on the future of US-Iran relations? Share your perspectives in the comments below, and consider subscribing to our newsletter for more expert insights on global affairs.

Iran is using its cyber capabilities to kidnap its foes in the real

The protests in Iran are not a revolution—yet. These events must occur

A JCPOA 2.0 will secure Iran as a threshold state but move it away from

Celebrity Homes & Lifestyles