Iran's Troubling Actions: A Deep Dive Into Decades Of Destabilization And Repression
A Legacy of State-Sponsored Terrorism and Regional Destabilization
One of the most persistent and concerning aspects of Iran's foreign policy has been its active engagement in state-sponsored terrorism and its role in regional destabilization. This is not a new phenomenon but a deeply entrenched policy, as highlighted by the U.S. State Department. In 2018, the State Department’s Iran Action Group explicitly stated, “since 1979, Iran’s Islamic Republic has made it a policy of the state to actively direct, facilitate and carry out terrorist activity.” This declaration underscores the systematic nature of Iran's involvement, moving beyond mere support to direct orchestration of such activities. This policy has manifested through various proxies and allied groups across the Middle East, which have, as one observer noted, "plunged the region into war." These actions have had devastating consequences, fueling conflicts in Yemen, Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon, and significantly contributing to the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While Iran might have once been in a stronger strategic position, its reliance on these proxies and its aggressive regional posture have backfired. The statement "But it has only itself to blame" points to the self-inflicted wounds of this strategy, where short-term gains are often outweighed by long-term regional instability and international isolation. The repercussions of this approach are becoming increasingly evident. Recent developments in the Middle East suggest that Iran's influence is waning in critical areas. For instance, it has been observed that "In 2024, the Islamic Republic lost in Gaza, in Lebanon." These "losses" refer to a diminished capacity to achieve strategic objectives through its proxies or to dictate outcomes in these crucial arenas. The costs of maintaining these networks, both financially and politically, are immense, and the strategic returns appear to be diminishing. The persistent nature of these "bad things Iran has done" also raises concerns about future escalation. There's a palpable tension regarding Iran's willingness to continue its aggressive stance. The potential consequences of such escalation are severe, with implications for global security. As one analysis suggests, "If Tehran is intent on escalating, the United States and its allies may have no other choice but to shift from punitive measures to dismantling Iran's military capabilities." This stark warning indicates the gravity of the situation and the potential for a significant shift in international response if Iran continues its current trajectory of regional destabilization and support for terrorism. The international community views these actions not merely as regional disputes but as direct threats to global peace and security, necessitating a firm and coordinated response.The Dire State of Human Rights: A Sharper Decline
Beyond its external actions, the internal human rights record of the Islamic Republic stands as one of the most egregious "bad things Iran has done." Since its inception, the post-revolutionary government has been widely criticized for its systematic suppression of civil liberties, political dissent, and fundamental human rights. This decline is not merely anecdotal but is supported by stark statistical evidence, demonstrating a significant deterioration compared to the era it overthrew.Escalating Executions and Political Repression
The scale of executions in Iran has reached alarming levels in recent years. A report from the Iran Human Rights organization revealed a deeply concerning trend: "more than 700 executions took place in Iran during the period between January and November 2023." This figure represents a "substantial increase" and highlights the regime's reliance on capital punishment, often for drug-related offenses or charges related to national security that lack due process. The sheer volume of executions signals a disregard for international human rights norms and a severe crackdown on any form of perceived opposition. Historical comparisons further underscore the severity of the current human rights situation. Political historian Ervand Abrahamian provides a chilling perspective on the post-revolution era, noting that "whereas less than 100 political prisoners had been executed between 1971 and 1979," under the Pahlavi dynasty, a dramatically different picture emerged after the revolution. Between 1981 and 1985 alone, "more than 7900 were executed." This staggering increase vividly illustrates that "The Islamic revolution is thought to have a significantly worse human rights record than the Pahlavi dynasty it overthrew." This period also saw the prison system become "centralized and drastically expanded," indicating a deliberate and systematic effort to control and suppress the population through fear and incarceration. The pervasive lack of social and political freedom, coupled with the threat of severe punishment, has left many of Iran's young and educated citizens feeling stifled and without hope for change from within.Suppression of Dissent and Targeting Journalists
The crackdown on human rights extends to the systematic suppression of dissent and the targeting of journalists, activists, and anyone perceived as a threat to the regime's authority. The absence of genuine "social and political freedom" is a hallmark of the Islamic Republic's governance. Citizens who dare to voice criticism or organize peaceful protests often face arbitrary arrest, lengthy detentions, and severe penalties, including execution. A poignant example of this repression is the case of Jason Rezaian, a journalist for The Washington Post. Rezaian, who "grew up in northern California and moved to Iran to report in 2009," joined The Washington Post in 2012. In 2014, he was "arrested and held in Evin Prison for 544 days—charged with espionage." His arbitrary detention and the vague charges against him, despite his journalistic credentials, sent a chilling message about the dangers of independent reporting within Iran. This incident is not isolated but part of a broader pattern where the Iranian government views independent media and critical voices as tools of foreign adversaries, thus justifying their suppression. Such actions are clear examples of the "bad things Iran has done" that directly violate international norms regarding freedom of the press and expression, further isolating the country from the global community and stifling internal discourse.Economic Woes and the Curse of Oil Dependency
Iran's economic landscape is a complex web of challenges, significantly shaped by its vast oil reserves, which paradoxically have been a source of both immense wealth and profound national tragedy. While oil has provided the regime with substantial revenue, its "reliance on it is unlikely to change for the foreseeable future," making the country vulnerable to global market fluctuations and geopolitical pressures. It's been argued that "Oil has arguably been more destructive for Iran than anything else," a powerful statement that encapsulates the nation's predicament. This "curse of oil" stems from several factors. Firstly, it has fostered a rentier state, where the government relies heavily on oil revenues rather than a diverse and productive economy. This has often led to a lack of accountability, as the state is less dependent on taxation from its citizens, thereby reducing the need for democratic responsiveness. Secondly, "Oil in many ways encapsulates Iran’s tragedy" because this resource has "tied Iran’s fortunes to Western powers it perceives as deeply exploitative." The historical context of foreign intervention and control over Iran's oil resources has created a deep-seated resentment, even as the country remains economically bound to global energy markets dominated by these same powers. This creates a perpetual cycle of distrust and economic vulnerability. Internally, the economic mismanagement and the impact of international sanctions (which will be discussed further) have led to severe hardships for the Iranian populace. "Growing poverty with inflation at more than 50%" is a stark reality for many Iranians. This hyperinflation erodes purchasing power, makes basic necessities unaffordable, and contributes to widespread discontent. The systematic corruption among Iran's political elite exacerbates these issues, diverting national wealth and resources away from public services and productive investments. This economic instability, fueled by both external pressures and internal governance failures, represents another significant aspect of the "bad things Iran has done" to its own people, leading to a profound sense of disillusionment, particularly among the younger generation. The lack of economic opportunity and the pervasive corruption are major factors contributing to the 13 crises facing President Raisi's government and Iranian society more broadly.The Weight of International Sanctions
As a direct consequence of its problematic actions on the global stage, particularly its nuclear program and support for terrorism, Iran has faced an unprecedented level of international sanctions. These punitive measures, implemented by various nations and international organizations, represent a collective effort to pressure Tehran into altering its behavior. "Numerous nations, particularly the United States, and international organizations have implemented various sanctions against Iran," targeting its financial sector, oil exports, shipping, and military industries. The cumulative effect of these sanctions has been devastating for the Iranian economy, contributing significantly to the "growing poverty with inflation at more 50%" mentioned earlier. The country's isolation from the global financial system has made it incredibly difficult to conduct international trade, attract foreign investment, and access critical goods and technologies. The severity of these measures is underscored by a striking fact: "After Russia invaded neighboring Ukraine in February 2022, Iran was the most sanctioned nation in the world until Russia overtook it." This statistic vividly illustrates the extent to which the international community has sought to curtail Iran's ability to finance its controversial activities and highlights the global consensus on the need to address the "bad things Iran has done." While sanctions are intended to pressure the regime, they often have a profound impact on the ordinary citizens, limiting their access to essential goods, medicines, and economic opportunities. This creates a complex humanitarian challenge, as the population bears the brunt of policies enacted by its government. The ongoing "deadlock in nuclear talks" further complicates the situation, as a resolution to the nuclear issue could potentially lead to some sanctions relief. However, as long as Iran continues its current trajectory, including its regional destabilization efforts and human rights abuses, the international community is likely to maintain, if not intensify, the pressure through sanctions, ensuring that the economic consequences of Iran's actions remain a significant burden.Internal Crises and Systemic Political Corruption
Beyond the external pressures and the human rights abuses, Iran is grappling with a multitude of internal crises that threaten its stability and future. Ebrahim Raisi, the eighth president of Iran, "has taken over at a time when the Islamic Republic is facing a series of major potential crises." These are not isolated incidents but systemic issues that have been building over decades, posing significant challenges to both his government and Iranian society at large. One of the most corrosive issues is "systematic corruption among Iran's political elite." This pervasive corruption undermines public trust, diverts resources, and exacerbates economic inequalities. It is a key factor contributing to the "growing poverty with inflation at more than 50%," as illicit gains enrich a select few at the expense of the general populace. The lack of transparency and accountability within the political system fuels public resentment and contributes to a sense of injustice. The article "This article will address the 13 crises facing Raisi’s government and Iranian society more broadly" hints at the sheer scale of the challenges. These crises likely encompass a range of issues from water scarcity and environmental degradation to brain drain, social unrest, and a generational gap. The "deadlock in nuclear talks" also falls under this umbrella of internal crises, as the failure to resolve this issue perpetuates international isolation and economic hardship, directly impacting the lives of ordinary Iranians. Furthermore, the "lack of social and political freedom" is a constant source of tension within Iranian society, particularly among the youth. This demographic, often more exposed to global information and values, feels the weight of the regime's restrictive policies most acutely. The combination of economic hardship, political repression, and social constraints creates a volatile environment, leading to periodic protests and widespread disillusionment. "Over the next several decades, these crises could have consequences that will not only affect Iran itself, but may reverberate across the region as well," highlighting that the internal stability of Iran is inextricably linked to the broader regional dynamics. The inability or unwillingness of the government to address these fundamental issues represents some of the most profound "bad things Iran has done" to its own people, creating a deeply fractured society.Military Setbacks and Strategic Weakening
Despite its aggressive posture and significant investment in military capabilities and proxy networks, Iran has recently experienced notable setbacks that have weakened its strategic position. These developments underscore the vulnerabilities inherent in its approach and the significant costs associated with its pursuit of regional dominance and controversial programs. One of the most striking recent blows to Iran's military and nuclear ambitions comes from its adversaries. "In just a few days, Israel has done significant damage to Tehran’s military and nuclear program." While the precise "true scale of the destruction is known only to Iranian leaders," the implication is clear: "it is unlikely that the country will easily rebound from this low ebb." This suggests that years of investment and effort in these critical areas have been severely compromised, setting back Iran's strategic objectives considerably. Such damage is not merely a tactical loss but a strategic one, impacting Iran's ability to project power and deter its enemies. Perhaps even more critically, Iran has suffered a significant degradation of its defensive capabilities. "Perhaps most significant, Iran has lost nearly all of its ability to defend its skies from adversaries." This vulnerability is a grave concern for any nation, let alone one that frequently engages in confrontational rhetoric and actions. A compromised air defense system leaves the country exposed to aerial attacks, undermining its national security and potentially inviting further aggression. This loss of defensive capacity is a direct consequence of the geopolitical tensions fueled by Iran's own actions, highlighting the self-destructive nature of some of the "bad things Iran has done." These military and strategic setbacks are part of a broader trend. As one observation notes, "Every dramatic development in the Middle East this year has left Iran weaker." This indicates a pattern where Iran's interventions and policies, rather than strengthening its hand, have led to a net loss of influence and capability. Whether through direct military engagements, the erosion of its proxy networks, or the successful counter-actions by its adversaries, Iran's strategic position appears to be eroding. This weakening complicates its ability to pursue its regional agenda and further isolates it on the global stage, demonstrating the long-term, detrimental consequences of its chosen path.A Persistent Adversary: US-Iran Relations
The relationship between the United States and Iran has been characterized by deep-seated animosity and distrust for over four decades, marking one of the most enduring and complex geopolitical rivalries in modern history. "Since the 1980s, Iran has been a key adversary of the U.S.," a status that places it as "a more significant challenge than other rivals like Venezuela." This adversarial stance stems from a confluence of factors, including the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the hostage crisis, Iran's nuclear ambitions, and its regional destabilization efforts. The fundamental ideological differences and conflicting strategic interests have consistently fueled tensions, making diplomatic breakthroughs rare and fragile. The rhetoric from both sides often reflects this deep animosity. The "religious fascists that chanted death to America" illustrate the fervent anti-American sentiment propagated by elements within the Iranian regime. Conversely, the U.S. has consistently viewed Iran's actions as a threat to its interests and those of its allies in the Middle East. This mutual distrust has led to a cycle of escalation, sanctions, and proxy conflicts that define the relationship. The future of this contentious relationship remains a central foreign policy concern, particularly in the context of global political changes. "With the results of the U.S. Election in 2024, the U.S. approach to the Iranian government will be a significant issue that will be front and center of many federal agencies in Washington, D.C." This highlights the enduring importance of Iran as a foreign policy challenge for any U.S. administration. The approach could range from renewed diplomatic efforts to increased pressure, depending on the incoming leadership's strategy. The historical context of this rivalry is also rife with allegations and suspicions. For instance, the claim that "Ronnie went behind the US government's back to make a deal with Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini to not release the hostages so Carter would look bad and he would win the election and give them a better deal" speaks to the deep-seated conspiracies and mistrust that have permeated the relationship. While the veracity of such claims is debated, their mere existence underscores the complex and often murky history that continues to influence perceptions and policy decisions. The ongoing tension and the potential for miscalculation between these two powers remain a significant source of global concern, underscoring the profound impact of the "bad things Iran has done" on its international standing.Public Perception and the Burden of Accountability
The cumulative impact of the "bad things Iran has done" has not only shaped its international standing but also influenced internal perceptions and the broader narrative surrounding the nation. While the Iranian government often attributes its woes to external forces, there's an increasing recognition, even within the country, that many challenges are self-inflicted. Historically, "Iranians have generally blamed foreign powers as the source of corruption in their society." This narrative, often promoted by the state, deflects responsibility for internal mismanagement, economic hardship, and social issues onto external adversaries. While foreign interference has certainly played a role in Iran's history, this blanket attribution often overshadows the profound impact of internal governance failures, systematic corruption among the political elite, and the regime's own policies. However, a critical perspective acknowledges that Iran "has only itself to blame" for many of its current predicaments, particularly its weakened strategic position and economic isolation. The choices made by the Islamic Republic, such as its aggressive regional foreign policy, its controversial nuclear program, and its severe human rights abuses, have directly led to international sanctions, military setbacks, and a significant decline in its global standing. The argument that "On balance, those who believe Iran has substantial influence tend to describe this as a bad thing" reflects a widespread view that Iran's current influence is often synonymous with destabilization and repression, rather than positive engagement. The contrast in living conditions and freedoms between Iran and other nations is also a point of discussion, even if sometimes misconstrued. While Whoopi Goldberg's assertion that "Black people living in America have it just as bad as people living in Iran" is a controversial and largely unsubstantiated comparison, as "it's very different to live in the United States in 2025 than it is to" live in Iran, it nonetheless highlights a global awareness of the severe restrictions and hardships faced by ordinary Iranians. This perception, whether accurate in its comparisons or not, underscores the widespread understanding that life under the current Iranian regime is characterized by significant challenges to personal freedom and well-being. Ultimately, the burden of accountability for the "bad things Iran has done" falls squarely on the shoulders of its leadership, whose decisions have profoundly shaped the nation's destiny and its relationship with the rest of the world. *** ### Conclusion The journey through the decades of the Islamic Republic of Iran reveals a complex tapestry of actions, many of which have had profound and often negative consequences both domestically and internationally. From its unwavering commitment to state-sponsored terrorism and regional destabilization, which has "plunged the region into war," to its alarming human rights record characterized by escalating executions and the suppression of dissent, the "bad things Iran has done" are numerous and far-reaching. Economically, the nation grapples with the "curse of oil," pervasive corruption, and the debilitating weight of international sanctions, leading to widespread poverty and inflation. Militarily, despite its ambitions, Iran has faced significant setbacks, including substantial damage to its programs and a critical loss of defensive capabilities. The persistent adversarial relationship with the United States further complicates its path forward, keeping it at the forefront of global security concerns. These interwoven challenges underscore a critical truth: while external pressures play a role, many of Iran's current predicaments are self-inflicted, a direct result of its strategic choices and internal governance. The consequences of these actions resonate not only within its borders, affecting the lives of millions of Iranians, but also reverberate across the Middle East and beyond. Understanding these facets is crucial for anyone seeking to comprehend the complexities of modern geopolitics and the enduring impact of a nation's choices on its own people and the world. We encourage you to share your thoughts on this complex topic in the comments below. What do you believe are the most significant challenges facing Iran today? For more in-depth analyses of global affairs and their impact, explore other articles on our site.
Other Ways to Say “Bad”, With Examples | Grammarly
Bad - Highway Sign image
When bad means good - Lesson Plan - ESL Brains
